English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Tom Regan's seafaring dog that is justifiably thrown out of the lifeboat built for four to save the lives of four humans has been the topic of much discussion. Critics have argued in a variety of ways that this dog nips at Regan's achilles heel. Without reviewing previous discussions, with much of which I certainly agree, I wish to develop an unexplored approach to exposing the vulnerability of the position which Regan takes on sacrificing the dog to save the humans. I will argue that when dealing with the seafaring dog Regan abandons his own principles and that this is exactly what he should do. Regan should abandon his view that all subjectsof-a-life have equal inherent worth.

Tom Regan's Seafaring Dog and (Un)Equal Inherent Worth