English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: The purpose of study was to investigate the migration experience and its impact on the depression and pregnancy rates among 14-17 year old girls of Mexican origin both in the United States and in Mexico. Methods: Study employed a mixed qualitative and quantitative methodology to compare risk for depression, pregnancy, and access to care. Results: Quantitative instruments to measure depression do not fully capture prevalence. Qualitative methods are therefore necessary to provide a fuller understanding of depression and the experience of participants with teen pregnancy. Conclusion: Working with vulnerable populations entails making methodological choices that empower communities. These choices are then confounded when the areas of research are sensitive topics.

Methodological Approaches to Conducting Research on Migration, Pregnancy and Depression with Mexican-Origin Adolescent Women in the United States