English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Using a competitive trapping method employing two different traps, the trapping rates of anionic radicals (CO 2   –   · and SO 3   –   ·), hydroxyl, and ethyl were quantified for various PBN- and DMPO-type traps. We have examined the characteristic effects of substituent and external pressure on the spin trapping of anionic radicals and compared with those of neutral radicals such as ethyl and hydroxyl radicals. In DMPO-type traps, the effects of substituent on trapping rates of two anionic radicals were small compared with that of C 2 H 5  ·. In PBN-type traps, the large effects of substituent on trapping rates of CO 2   –   · and C 2 H 5  · were observed. Further, the activation volumes determined from the pressure dependence experiments for competitive reactions show a difference in pressure behavior between the two trapping reactions, and enable us to speculate on the reaction mechanism of substituted PBN and DMPO traps for anionic radicals.

zeitschrift für physikalische chemie

Effects of Substituent and External Pressure on Spin Trapping Rates of Carbon Dioxide Anion, Sulfur Trioxide Anion, Hydroxyl, and Ethyl Radicals with Various PBN- and DMPO-Type Spin Traps