English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Abstract:  Since a consensus is developing that a Hexateuchal redaction preceded the final Pentateuchal redaction (Blum, Otto, Römer a.o.), the latter must have addressed the problem of removing the book of Joshua from Israel's charter document without abandoning its central theme within the Pentateuch. According to this view Num 25–36 can be ascribed to a Pentateuchal redactor, who created from existing material a well structured composition which focuses on the conquest and the distribution of the promised land as a task for the future (32–34). Thus, the book of Joshua was replaced and factually corrected. The composition was attached to the Balaam story (22–24*), which had been inserted by the Hexateuchal redactor, by means of several redactional links (22,4.7).

A Pentateuchal Redaction in the Book of Numbers?: The Late Priestly Layers of Num 25–36