English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The article discusses the most recent source-critical reconstruction of two pre-Priestly linkages (»J/E«) between the ancestor tradition and the Moses tradition (L. Schmidt, ZAW 124 [2012], 19–37) and seeks the reasons for the surprisingly persistent disagreement about the literary history of this section of text (in particular the Joseph narrative). Drawbacks are identified, inter alia, in the inappropriate equation of (synchronic) incoherence and (diachronic) disunity (»Uneinheitlichkeit«) and the failure to appreciate conventions or possibilities of narrative style. Conversely, it can be shown that the standard Judah/Reuben division and the proposed J/E strands in Gen 50 – Ex 1 result in an unaccountable lack of coherence. Instead indications of the incorporation of an artistically composed »Josephnovelle« into a free-standing patriarchal narrative are affirmed and the literary combination of »Genesis« and »Exodus«, probably for the first time, in the Priestly tradition (KP) and their post-Priestly elaboration are outlined.

Zwischen Literarkritik und Stilkritik: Die diachrone Analyse der literarischen Verbindung von Genesis und Exodus – im Gespräch mit Ludwig Schmidt