English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

What is a good framework for discourse analysis? A good set of structures for discourse analysis will be capable of capturing in its 'net' nearly everything that goes on in discourse. In this article I shall be drawing on a previous article that provides the broad framework for such analysis (Poythress 1982). Here I shall be concerned with explicating the role of hierarchy in discourse. The general principles will be illustrated using Mark 4:30-32 as an example. It should be noted that the hierarchies I will be speaking of are those associated with the linear temporal order of a discourse. But with certain changes the material should be applicable to semiotic theory in general. Hierarchy can occur in a context of spatial dimensions or abstract dimensions, as well as in the context of the temporal dimension. My discussion is confined to the hierarchies of language because I believe that this is a stable starting point from which to generalize later into semiotics.

Hierarchy in discourse analysis: A revision of tagmemics