English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article explores the assumption that the 19 th  century tradition of aesthetics following Johann Friedrich Herbart provides a conceptual and notional basis for ›classic‹ 20 th  century structuralism. This proto-structuralism, which is hitherto unexplored, rests upon theoretical innovations that concern, on the one hand, the temporalization and processing of the form concept and, on the other hand, its foundation in form-related connections and differences. Furthermore, this interrelation traces a history of theory that records the existence of theoretical complexities in different ›places‹ and at different times - with the result that formal aesthetics and 20 th  century structuralisms are ›only‹ different occurrences of this same complexity.

»Überhaupt stammt der Strukturalismus ja aus Deutschland«: Zur theoriegeschichtlichen Bedeutung der formalen Ästhetik im 19. Jahrhundert