English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article weaves together the intricate realms of authorship and scientific capital within the context of the Tumor Bank at Mexico’s National Institute of Cancerology (INCan). As intellectual property paradigms continue to evolve, the notion of authorship emerges as an intriguing avenue for the dissemination of knowledge. This study employs ethnographic methods to investigate the multifaceted conflicts involving the ownership of biological samples, the authorship of research outputs, and scientific capital. In the context of INCan’s research setting, the discrepancies in sample distribution serve as a symbolic reflection of the scientific capital and influence exercised by researchers. In doing so, interviews with INCan researchers illuminate how intricate collegial and personal relationships and alliances are navigated in order to secure coveted samples. Within this intricate interplay, credibility and power dynamics intertwine, crafting a tapestry of considerable complexity shaping the nuanced dynamics of authorship within the academic sphere.

Spectral Shadows in Scientific Practice: Unveiling the Haunting Effects of Authorship and Scientific Capital Accumulation