English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The reaction between [Ru(H 2 O) 6 ] 2+  and dimethylformamide (DMF) was studied as a function of the temperature and the pressure at pH 1. When a slight excess of Ru aquaion is used, [Ru(H 2 O) 5 DMF] 2+  is the only product of the reaction observed in the NMR spectra and the DMF is bound through the oxygen atom. From variable temperature experiments, the rate constants, activation enthalpies and entropies for the formation and the dissociation of the monocomplex were determined. These are as follows: 10 4  x k f  298 =(8.2 ± 0.4) kg mol -1  s -1  ΔΗ ☨  f = 83.6 ± 3 k J mol -1  Δ S ☨  f  = -23.7 ± 10 J K -1 mol -1  for the formation reaction, 10 3  x k  d 298  = (1.10 ± 0.04) s -1  ΔΗ ☨  f = 90.2 ± 2 kJ mol -1  ΔS ☨  f , = +1.0 ± 7 J Κ -1  mol  -1  for the dissociation reaction. The thermodynamic parameters (equilibrium constant at 298.15 K, reaction enthalpy and entropy) were also determined:K 298  eq  = 0.74 ± 0.02 kg mol -1  , ΔH 0  = -6.6 ± 2 k j mol -1  , ΔS 0  =-24.7 ± 6 JK -1 . The k f  value is similar to the previously reported rate constants for monocomplex formation reactions with other ligands and confirms that the entering ligand has no effect on the rate. From variable pressure experiments, the activation volumes for the formation and the dissociation reactions and the reaction volume were determined: ΔV f  ☨  = +2.7 ± 0.6 cm3 mol -1  , ΔV d  ☨ = 0.9 ± 0.7 cm 3  mol -1  , ΔV° = +3.6 ± 0 . 9 cm3 mol  -1  respectively. These results show that the volume of the transition state is intermediate between the volume of the reactants and the volume of the products. It demonstrates that the mechanism is the same as for the water exchange on [Ru(H 2 O) 6  ]  2+  , i.e. an Id mechanism. Contraction of the bonds between Ru and the spectator ligands at the transition state may explain the abnormally small activation volumes. The need of theoretical calculations on these systems is emphasized.

Reaction between [Ru(H 2 O) 6 ] 2+ and DMF: A Complete Volume Profile of a Monocomplex Formation Reaction on a d 6 Low Spin Aquaion