English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The defendant (Goodwin) (G) had bludgeoned the victim to death with a hammer. At trial he pleaded self-defence and in the alternative loss of control, the latter being a partial defence to murder.  Section 54(1) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.   The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was right not to leave the partial defence to murder to the jury given the facts. The Court made observations in relation to how a trial judge should approach the partial defence including the fact that relevant and admissible evidence would be required for each of its elements.

international commentary on evidence

Criminal Evidence: Evidencing Defences to Murder.  R v Goodwin (Anthony Gerard)  [2018] EWCA Crim 2287: Court of Appeal Criminal DivisionJudges: David LJ, King J and May J