English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The following article deals with intercultural communication research as a (potential)  subfield of communication studies. The broader aim is to contribute to the history as well as  to the systematization of the field of intercultural communication research. The author is mapping  three very different national research communities: Germany, France and the US. The main question is:  Why, in each of the countries under comparison, do communication studies deal so differently with the  subject of intercultural communication as a research topic and/or field? The methodology is comparative  and focuses on the differences and similarities in the three national communities of communication studies  and research. Both the German and the French communication researchers look closely (but again  differently and completely in ignorance of each other) at US research. It appears that research traditions  and general trends of mainstreaming in communication studies are highly influential as gatekeepers or  barriers to intercultural communication research as a subfield of communication studies.

communications

Pathways of intercultural communication research. How different research communities of communication scholars deal with the topic of intercultural communication