English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Additive manufacturing of dental prostheses e.g. composite materials is continuously finding broader application in dentistry. In the oral environment, the materials are subjected to hydrolysis and accelerated hydrolysis by enzymes. With the aim to compare an additively manufactured composite with a self-curing and a CAD/CAM material of the same composition, the effect of enzymatic degradation and hydrolysis on the materials were investigated. The experimental composites consisted of 50 wt. % inorganic filler and 50 wt. % monomer matrix (BisEMA, BisGMA, TEGDMA). The influence of hydrolysis via a buffer system was investigated in comparison to enzymatic degradation by cholesterol esterase over 22 days. The detection of degradation products over time was conducted by HPLC-DAD analysis. Degradation products and monomers calibrated were: TEGDMA, BisGMA, BisEMA, MA, TEGMA, Bis-HPPP and E-bis-PA. Surface roughness of polished specimens was measured by AFM and hardness with a Vickers micro hardness tester. After enzymatic degradation and hydrolysis, BisGMA was detected in the eluates of the additively manufactured composites. The samples fabricated by CAD/CAM behaved similar during hydrolysis, where additionally MA was detected. After enzymatic degradation, furthermore TEGMA and BisEMA were detected qualitatively. In contrast, the self-curing material exhibited traces of MA, TEGMA, TEGDMA and BisGMA after enzymatic degradation. Hereof detectable upon hydrolysis were MA, TEGMA and BisGMA. Surface roughness was comparable for all manufactured samples whereas the hardness was lowest of the 3D printed material. Enzymatic degradation and hydrolysis had no effect on surface roughness and hardness. The additively manufactured composite appeared to have low susceptibility to enzymatic degradation and hydrolysis. Due to the manufacturing process, the polishability and initial hardness are poorer.

Effect of enzymatic degradation and hydrolysis on 3D-printed resin-based composite material for temporary dental crowns and bridges