English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In a follow-up study on a "Research Jury Method" for qualitatively adjudicating statements about psychotherapy process and outcome (Bohart, Tallman, Byock, & Mackrill, 2011), the utility of 56 criteria for aiding jurors in analyzing a case history was examined. It was found that these criteria were useful in helping jurors identify aspects of the case that led to their conclusions. Utilizing the criteria also helped jurors adjudicate differences between them.

Developing a Systematic Framework for Utilizing Discrete Types of Qualitative Data as Therapy Research Evidence