English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study aims to qualitatively investigate the degree of correspondence between the generic instructional design model that is shortly called ADDIE and two other contemporary models of instructional design, FutureU and Isman Instructional Design Models. ADDIE is considered to be the ancestor of contemporary models of instructional design and it is thus believed to be reflected to certain degrees in the following models of instructional design. In short, this study aims to examine similarities and differences between the generic model and its two follower models by examining similarities and differences. These qualitative comparisons were centered upon the two main themes that were derived in respect to the basic principles of instructional design. The two main qualitative themes and thus the examination criteria for the study included a) what ADDIE components were included and how they were reflected and b) what structural characteristics these two models exhibit. The results showed that the two models represent a considerable number of similarities to the generic ADDIE model and the differences were only on the varied applications or adaptations of the firmly established dimensions already offered by the ADDIE model itself.

A qualitative analysis and comparison of the two contemporary models of instructional design