English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

(Official Development Assistance, ODA)                        ODA      .     248       ,  t-,  Duncan      .       ODA       ‘   ’      ,    ODA   ‘  · ’         .   ODA     ‘ ’ ‘   ’                .  ODA          ,                     .         .Abstract: The purpose of this study was to draw policy implications for the development and expansion ofKorea’s forest ODA through investigating the perceptions of stakeholder on the fields that contributed thedevelopment of forestry in Korea and would have competitiveness in developing countries and priority fields forKorea’s forest ODA. For this, the survey was conducted for 248 subjects from the general and expertstakeholder groups. Chi-square test in cross analysis, independent sample t-test, ANOVA and Duncan test wereconducted to compare the difference of perceptions by group. The whole general and expert groups consider that‘forest conservation and rehabilitation’ contributed to the development of Korea’s forestry most and consider itsglobal competitiveness most high. Comparing expert groups, ODA experts evaluated the competitiveness of‘capacity building for policies, institutions and research’ higher than the forestry experts. For priority fields ofKorea’s forest ODA, general groups perceived ‘management of CERs’ and ‘conservation of biodiversity’ mostimportant, showing the clear difference in perception compared to that of experts. In Conclusion, for theeffective forest ODA of Korea, the effort to fill the gap between the general and expert groups needs to bemade, as well as developing forestry capacity building programs to cope with the fields such as climate changeadaptation and biodiversity conservation, which is newly required in a global society, in addition to using thepast experience of forest rehabilitation in Korea. It will be useful for the rehabilitation of North Korea’s forestin the future.Key words: forestry, official development assistance (ODA), competitiveness, priority fields, perception of stakeholder,North Korea*Corresponding authorE-mail: yoobi4951@korea.kr

A Strategy for Official Development Assistance in Forest Sector based on Evaluation by Field in Korea