English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

When we think of Michel Foucault’s contribution to the history of contemporary political thought, we don’t usually refer to his investigations, conducted in the eighties, into the ethics of the care of oneself of Greco-Roman Antiquity. Does that research, nevertheless, lack any political meaning or consequence? To answer this question, we must first put forward the terms of what is mainly at stake in those investigations: the possibility to think differently what it means for a subject to be constituted. With them, Foucault seems to have found an experience and a practice of subjectivation that, once its ontological structure becomes clear, also allows us think of a concept of political action as immanent and autonomous subjectivation capable of resisting the modern dispositifs of power.

Ontolog�a y resistencia: la constituci�n de s� como paradigma de acci�n pol�tica en el �ltimo Fouca