English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This paper examines notions of power in relation to evidence-informed policy making and explores four key areas. Firstly, I outline contemporary conceptualisations of how power operates in society; secondly, I spotlight the implications of power inequalities for how evidence is used by policy makers (and present the policy ‘agora’; a discursively controlled paradigm of ideology and epistemology which serves to distinguish between the types of evidence that policy makers will and won’t engage with); thirdly, I then define what I consider as evidence ‘misuse’; before finishing with an analysis of why evidence misuse materialises and how its enactment might be minimised.

The policy agora: how power inequalities affect the interaction between researchers and policy makers