English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The lamellar body count (LBC) represents an alternative method to the TDx-FLM II (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL), which is planned to be discontinued, for assessing fetal lung maturity. Our objective was to validate the LBC on 3 hematology analyzers (Coulter LH 750 and Coulter Ac.T diff2, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA; and Sysmex XE-2100, Sysmex, Mundelein, IL) to serve as a template for other laboratories attempting to perform in-house validation. Intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation ranged from 1.7% to 21.8% and 1.9% to 7.1%, respectively, and all analyzers demonstrated excellent linearity. Whole blood and meconium were shown to interfere with LBCs, and specimens with these contaminants should be tested using phosphatidyl glycerol. With a TDx-FLM II cutoff of 55 mg/g or more and an LBC cutoff of 50,000/microL or more for maturity, concordance between the TDx-FLM II and the LBC on all instruments was poor (&lt;80% in all cases). Concordance between hematology analyzers was excellent (&gt;or=94%). When laboratories are performing in-house validations, they should not correlate LBC with TDx-FLM II results without outcome data. Correlation with another validated LBC method is preferred.

Validation of Lamellar Body Counts Using Three Hematology Analyzers