English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

If a man on Twin Earth says, "There is a glass of water on the table", then I will translate his utterance homophonically. In some cases, a footnote will remark that the liquid called "water" on Twin Earth is actually XYZ and not H2O. In other cases, I will not bother with the footnote (depending on why I am translating or interpreting the Twin Earth utterance in the first place). In cases of the second type, I treat the Twin Earth word water as differing in meaning (not "content") from earth "water"; in cases of the first type I treat it as the same word. What of the context of lexicography? I think (for reasons developed at length in "The Meaning of 'Meaning'") that a lexicographer should treat the difference in extension as a difference in meaning. (But no good translator relies too heavily on dictionary "meanings".) I will not fall into the trap of answering a question Fodor poses in Fodor's own philosophical jargon. I have great admiration for Jerry's acumen and ingenuity; I am sure he can move around in his system of thought far better than I could ever learn to do. My view agrees with Quine's: to think of "meanings" (or "contents") as mental or platonic entities is just a mistake. They are obscure entities at best; to say they are nee4ed for "cognitive psychology" is to say the obscure is needed for the obscure. (If "psychology" just means informal belief-desire explanation, then my position isn't that "the sky is falling", but that such talk works fine in context, given good reasons for talking that way, given, as Wittgenstein says, a whole language in place.)

Comment on J. A. Fodor's ``Cognitive science and the twin-Earth problem''.