English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method has bee n used to identify the best technical service provider to perform a field development plan (FDP) document of Field X. AHP is the method that can be used to solve multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. AHP structures a MCDM problem by developing a decision hierarchy which pr esents the relationships of goal, criteria and alternatives. The Technology Capability and the Pr oject Deliverability criteria show the highest overall weight; those are 0.270 and 0.244 respectiv ly, while Reliability Company and Technology Transfer have similar lowest numbers of the overall weight; those are 0.067 and 0.069 respectively. The Cost criterion is the third highest, and the Tr ack Record Performance criterion is the fourth highest, that is 0.188 and 0.162 respectively. The Provider 5 and Provider 1 have the highest and the second highest of the overall weight; those are 0.2 895 and 0.2546 respectively, while the Provider 2 has the lowest overall weight; that is 0.1246. That means, based on this method, the Provider 5 is selected as the provider to conduct the works of de veloping FDP for the Field X.

Selecting a Profound Technical Service Provider to Perform a Technical Field Development Study from Given Multiple Criteria