English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

DOI: 10.12957/polemica.2017.29596  As regras e regulamentos criados para garantir a equidade no processo de selecao de professores para universidades publicas no Brasil as vezes falham. Realizou-se um estudo qualitativo, com abordagem de pesquisa-acao sistemica, entrevistando 13 professores que alegam ter sido prejudicados em diferentes processos de selecao. A analise qualitativa revelou sete temas recorrentes: 1) Os membros do comite nao seguiram os procedimentos do edital; 2) Os membros do comite agiram em favor de um candidato em detrimento dos outros; 3) Houve conluio para corrigir os resultados; 4) A selecao dos protegidos fazia parte de dinâmicas que envolviam luta pelo poder nas universidades; 5) O organizador do exame tinha vinculos comerciais, academicos ou politicos com o candidato selecionado; 6) Os membros do comite nao tinham formacao e nem conhecimento da area de saber exigida no exame; 7) Os candidatos prejudicados evitaram tomar acoes legais contra as pessoas responsaveis ​​pela selecao por medo de retaliacao futura. Nossa analise sistemica sugere que os processos controversos de selecao podem ser conduzidos por razoes nao relacionadas a excelencia academica, mas sim a uma luta pelo poder na academia. Palavras chaves: Selecao. Conluio. Pesquisa-acao Sistemica.  Abstract: The rules and regulations created to assure fairness in the selection process of professors for public universities in Brazil sometimes fail. We conducted a qualitative study, with a systemic action research approach, interviewing 13 professors that claimed to be harmed different selection processes. Seven recurrent themes emerged: 1) The committee members did not follow the edict´s procedures; 2) The committee members acted in favor of one candidate to the detriment of the others; 3) There was collusion to fix the results; 4) The selection of protegees was part of dynamics that involve a fight for power at the universities; 5) The exam organizer had previous commercial, academic or political ties to the selected candidate; 6) The committee members did not have knowledge in the field of the exam; 7) The harmed candidates avoided taking legal action against the people responsible for the selection for fear of future retaliation. Our analysis suggests that controversial selection processes can be driven for reasons not related to academic excellence, but instead to a fight for power in academia. Keywords : Recruitment. Collusio. Systemic Action Research.

CRIANDO REGRAS APENAS PARA QUEBRÁ-LAS: UMA ANÁLISE SISTÊMICA DE TREZE PROCESSOS CONTROVERSOS DE SELEÇÃO DE DOCENTES