English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Journalists have integrated social networks in their professional routines. Social networks allow spreading content and interacting with the audience. However, in its role as an information source, they are controversial. Journalists oftn choose the immediacy of Twitter to get information. The aim of this paper is to analyze the content  of tweets associated to hashtags to measure its potential as an information source of unexpected events. In order  to do so, we have used a combination of quantitative and qualitative techniques of content analysis. We have  studied the tweets linked to #ArdeValencia, a tag about the wildfires in July 2012 in Valencia (Spain), which burned  50000 hectares. The findings indicate that almost no scoop is disseminated. We detect little exclusive information.  Nevertheless, it’s frequent to find reiterative comments, data and news previously published in the traditional  media. From this perspective, Twitter’s role as an information source is doubtful, but it can work as an ambiental  thermometer. In fact, about half of tweets criticize the Valencian Government, due to their budget cuts on wildfire  prevention. Therefore, we note users use hashtags to take sides and express their ideology.

Twitter como fuente informativa de sucesos imprevistos: el seguimiento de hashtags en el caso #ArdeValencia