English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper proposes three alternative confidence intervals namely, AADM-t, MAAD-t and MADM-t, which are simple adjustments to the Student-t confidence interval for estimating the population mean of a positively skewed distribution. The proposed methods are very easy to calculate and are not overly computer-intensive. The performance of these confidence intervals was compared through a simulation study using the following criterion: (a) coverage probability (b) average width and (c) coefficient of variation of width. Simulation studies indicate that for small sample sizes and moderate/highly positively skewed distributions, the proposed AADM-t confidence interval performs the best and it is as good as the Student-t confidence interval. Some real-life data are analyzed which support the findings of this paper to some extent.

Confidence Intervals based on Absolute Deviation for Population Mean of a Positively Skewed Distribution