English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A successful model of high Reynolds number cavity flows involves reproducing the flow physics with adequate accuracy, given the available computational resources. The process of planning high Reynolds number cavity flow simulations is systematically reviewed to extract the dependence of different programmer's choices on the CFD mesh size and on the cost of the computation.    This process has been broken down into five phases: i) description of the problem in the continuous domain, ii) problem order reduction by turbulence modelling, iii) discretization in space and time, iv) integration of the governing equations, v) costing the numerical operations of the flow solver. This paper examines the influence of each phase on the spectral width and the grid density, which are the key CFD indicators that determine the cost of the computation.    A dimensional analysis was conducted to separate the effects of the geometry of the enclosure, the boundary layer resolution, the turbulence model, and the numerical scheme order of accuracy. Regression analysis on the non-dimensional groups of published cavity CFD simulations determined the range of practical values used by current state-of-the-art computations. This analysis is a useful tool for obtaining design trade-offs by a multivariate optimization in cavity flow CFD and for estimating the order of magnitude of the computational resources required by the simulations.

Regressing the Size and Cost of Turbulent Cavity Flow Simulations