English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We evaluated clinical outcomes of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support in patients with or without severe right heart failure, in order to determine what kind of organ allocation system could help severe biventricular failure patients to be safely bridged to heart transplantation (HTx), even in Japan where the waiting time for HTx is extremely long. Methods and Results: One hundred and seventy consecutive patients who were implanted with continuous-flow LVAD at the present institution were included in this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 158 patients with isolated LVAD (group-LVF) and 12 patients who required long-term mechanical or inotropic right heart support (group-BVF). Post-LVAD survival in group-BVF was significantly worse than in group-LVF (P&lt;0.0001). Given that many patients in group-BVF died between 1 and 2 years after LVAD implantation, Kaplan-Meier survival curve simulation was carried out under the condition that all the patients in group-BVF who died on LVAD support &gt;1 year after LVAD implantation had received HTx at 365 days after LVAD implantation and survived thereafter. In this simulation, no significant difference in survival was seen between the groups (P=0.2424).

Rescuing Patients With Severe Biventricular Failure in the Era of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device