English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

HFER(+1.01°C) than LPAPR (-.54°C) and TPAPR (-.79°C) (p<.001). However, end point subjective perceptions of facial heat and overall body comfort (rated slightly warm warm) were not different between respirators. In addition, no differences were found between genders in all measurements. CONCLUSION: Subjects who wore PAPRs in our study had lower microclimate temperature, humidity and thus facial temperature, compared to other models, possibly due to the effect of forced air flow. However, these differences in measured parameters were not subjectively perceived and may be further offset for workers in hot, humid conditions and may lead to escalating factors for heat stress.

Characterizing The Bioenergetic Profile Of White Blood Cells For Utility In Assessing Mitochondrial Dysfunction In Gulf War Illness