English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background  One year has passed since the announcement of COVID-19 as a pandemic and two waves had already stricken Egypt. The authors witnessed several atypical radiological features through the second pandemic wave, either early at the active infective stage or delayed at the post-infectious convalescent period. They believed every radiologist should be familiar with these features. Therefore, they performed this comparative study on 2000 Egyptian patients using multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) to highlight the radiological differences between the first and second pandemic waves and correlate them to the clinical status.    Results  This random multi-center comparative study was retrospectively conducted on 2000 COVID-19 Egyptian patients; 1000 patients were registered at the first pandemic wave from April 2020 till September 2020, while the other 1000 patients were registered at the second pandemic wave from October 2020 till March 2020. Follow up CT examinations were performed for 49 and 122 patients through the first and second pandemic waves respectively. MSCT examinations were carefully evaluated by four expert consulting radiologists who came to a consensus. Meanwhile, the correlation with the clinical outcome was performed by two consulting pulmonologists. During the second pandemic wave, the prevalence rate of the “crazy-paving” pattern had significantly increased by 1.3 times ( P  value = 0.002). Additionally, the prevalence rate of the “air-bubble” sign had significantly increased by 1.9 times ( P  value = 0.02). Similarly, the presence of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (> 1 cm in short-axis diameter) had significantly increased by 1.7 times ( P  value = 0.036). Furthermore, the prevalence rate of pericardial effusion had significantly increased by 2.5 times ( P  value = 0.003). The above-mentioned signs were correlated to increased clinical severity and higher rates of hospitalization. Unexpectedly, other atypical radiological signs were only encountered through the second pandemic wave, including bronchiectatic changes (2.5%), “head-cheese” pattern (0.8%), cavitation (0.5%), and “bulls-eye” sign (0.2%). The prevalence rate of post-COVID fibrosis had doubled through the second wave but not in a significant way ( P  value = 0.234). Secondary fungal infection was only encountered throughout the second pandemic wave in four patients. COVID-19 reinfection was encountered in a single patient only during the second pandemic wave.    Conclusion  After 1 year from the announcement of COVID-19 as a pandemic, the radiological presentation of COVID-19 patients showed some significant differences between its first and second waves.

the egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine /the egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine

COVID-19 in Egypt after a year: the first and second pandemic waves from the radiological point of view; multi-center comparative study on 2000 patients