English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background Monitoring antiretroviral therapy through CD4T-cell count and viral load or reverse transcriptase assessment is used in developed countries. However, cost implication, demand of sophisticated equipments, high level manpower need made such technology impracticable in most of the African laboratory settings. Developing countries having the fewer specialized diagnostic facilities and more affected by the disease requires reliable and cost effective monitoring options (W.H.O., 2003). Research works carried out on various viral parameters such as p24 antigen, plasma RNA, rapid reverse transcriptase detection method were put into trials; p24 antigen emerged as the best possible option for African laboratories use (because of its simplicity and affordability) and correlates well with viral load and can be used as an alternative to viral load monitoring (Schupbach, et al., 2003).

retrovirology

Comparative study on use of CD4 T cell count and plasma P24 antigen concentration in antiretroviral therapy monitoring for HIV/AIDs patients in Kano, Nigeria