English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Results In both the blinded and the non-blinded analysis VEP habituation was normal in HV (slope -0.12 & -0.2 respectively), but deficient in both migraine groups: MO (+0.02 & +0.09), MA (+0.03 & +0.03). The difference between HV and MO or MA was significant for the blinded (p = 0.03 or p = 0.001) and the non-blinded procedure–(p = 0.03 or p = 0.003). Ictal VEP habituation was normal in both blinded and the non-blinded analyses (-0.21 & -0.23; p = 0.001 vs. interictal). Intraindividual habituation slope was similar between blinded and non-blinded analyses. Data obtained by non-blinded and the blinded procedure significantly correlated (overall R = 0.780. p < 0.1).

EHMTI-0222. Habituation of visual evoked potentials in migraine: comparison between blinded and non-blinded analyses