English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Category:   Midfoot/Forefoot; BunionIntroduction/Purpose:   The most common joint preparation techniques mentioned in literature for 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis are 'cup and cone' and 'flat-cuts'. A third option of an 'in-situ' technique, has rarely been studied. This study compares the clinical, radiographic, and patients-reported outcomes of 'in-situ' joint preparation with a traditional 1st MTP joint preparation technique.Methods:   The 'in-situ' technique utilizes the same dorsal surgical incision as traditional techniques. Cartilage and osteophyte removal are carried out using standard techniques without the use of specific reamers or a sagittal saw. The arthrodesis is performed in-situ with the similar freedom of joint positioning as the cup and cone technique, and traditional fixation constructs are applied. In this study, A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent 1st MTP joint arthrodesis between January 2015 and December 2019. The complication, revision and non-union rates were examined in a multivariable logistic regression model. Patient reported outcome were analyzed in a repeated measures general linear model. Analysis of variance and Receiver Operating Characteristic were used to assess radiographic measurements.Results:   Total of 388 1st MTP joint arthrodesis cases were included. Overall, 262 'Flat-Cuts' and 126 'In-Situ' cases were analyzed. Mean follow-up time was 292 days (median 174, SD 305). Joint-preparation technique did not have statistically significant impact on union rates (p=0.311) or revision rates (p=0.898). Diabetes-Mellitus was the most powerful predictor of non-union (p&lt;0.001, OR 6.558, 95% CI: 2.534-16.969) and revision (p=0.02, OR 3.662, 95% CI: 1.230-10.905). The rate of transfer- metatarsalgia was significantly higher in 'flat-cuts' (p=0.015, OR 6.808, 95% CI: 1.460-31.744). Visual-Analogue-Scale and PROMIS- CAT-Physical significantly improved at 6-weeks, 3-months, and at last follow-up in both techniques (p&lt;0.001, p=0.001), and the improvement was comparable between the techniques (p=0.078, p=0.100).'In-situ' technique resulted in significantly less mean 1st- ray shortening (3.05mm vs 7.64mm, p&lt;0.001). In a Receiver-Operating-Characteristic analysis of transfer metatarsalgia and 1st ray shortening, the optimal diagnostic cut-off was 6.87 mm (LR 1.67, AUC 0.652, p=0.005, 95% CI: 0.56-0.74).Conclusion:   'In-situ' joint preparation technique is a simple, safe, and cost-effective technique for 1st MTP joint arthrodesis. In our series, 'in-situ' technique had a similar or better complication profile than the 'flat-cuts', while providing similar patient- reported outcomes. 'In-situ' technique resulted in significantly less 1st ray shortening, which was a predictor of transfer metatarsalgia.

“In-Situ” Joint Preparation Technique for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparative Study with “Flat-Cuts” Technique