English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Most driving torques in serial industrial robots are used to overcome the weight of the robot. Although actuators account for a large proportion of the total mass of a robot, they have yet to become a positive factor that enables the robot to achieve gravity balance. This study presents a host–parasite structure to reconstruct the distribution of actuators and achieve gravity balance in robots. First, based on the characteristics of tree–rattan mechanisms, a method for calculating the degrees of freedom and a symbolic representation method for the distribution of branched chains are formulated for host–parasite mechanisms. Second, a configuration analysis and optimization method for host–parasite structure-based robots and a robot prototype are presented. Finally, four host–parasite mechanisms/robots (A, B, C, and D) are compared. The results are as follows. If more parasitic branched chains are added to the yz plane, the loads along axes 2 and 3 become more balanced, which significantly increases the stiffnesses of the mechanism in the y- and z-directions ( K y  and K z , respectively). If the additional branched chains are closer to the site of maximum deformation, the stiffness of the mechanism in the z-direction ( K z ) increases more significantly. Of the four mechanisms, mechanism D has the best overall performance. The joint torques of mechanism D along axes 2 and 3 are lower than those of mechanism A by 99.78% and 99.18%, respectively. In addition, K x , K y , and K z  of mechanism D are 100.56%, 336.19%, and 385.02% of those of mechanism A, respectively. Moreover, the first-order natural frequency of mechanism D is 135.94% of that of mechanism A. Host–parasitic structure is conducive to improving the performance of industrial robots.

A host–parasite structural analysis of industrial robots