English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Jürgen Rehm: Draining the ocean to prevent shark attacks? The empirical foundation of alcohol policy    The line of reasoning behind current alcohol policy is examined and related to empirical research on the consequences of alcohol consumption. It is found that current alcohol policy places too much emphasis on both aggregate consumption and chronic disease as the main problems, and availability and access to alcohol as the most important instruments in reducing alcohol-related harm. There is empirical evidence, however, that other forms of harm are equally if not more important in many cases, and that the empirical links between availability and consumption, and between consumption and harm, are not always as important as predicted. Some consequences for alternative alcohol policy strategies for the future are discussed.

Draining the ocean to prevent shark attacks?: The empirical foundation of alcohol policy