English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study compares the effectiveness of two drug combinations–010-(010a) bupivacaine with adrenaline and (b) bupivacaine with adrenaline and pethidine — on operative and postoperative pain relief when administered by the caudal route in infants and children.    A randomised controlled trial was conducted on fifty children below the age of twelve years: 25 children were randomly allocated to each group. Both groups had a significant period of analgesia in the postoperative period. None of the children in either group required parenteral analgesia. Though the group with pethidine had a longer duration of analgesia and sedation, the very high incidence of vomiting and delay in urination observed in this group would preclude the use of pethidine routinely. No respiratory depression was seen in either group.

anaethesia and intensive care/anaesthesia and intensive care

A Comparison of Caudal Epidural Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Pethidine for Operative and Postoperative Analgesia in Infants and Children