English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective To compare superior versus anteroinferior plating for displaced midshaft clavicular fracture in elderly patients. Methods We retrospectively compared the functional result, parameters, and perioperative course of displaced midshaft clavicular fracture in 42 patients &gt;60 years treated with a 3.5-mm reconstruction plate placed superiorly versus anteroinferiorly. Results Groups were similar with regard to age, sex, bone mineral density, cause of injury, and fracture pattern. The superiorly-plated group had a significantly longer operation time and greater blood loss, complications and implant prominence. Constant scores were significantly higher for the anteroinferiorly-plated group than the superiorly-plated group at 3 months postoperatively; however, there was no difference between groups at final follow-up. Conclusion While both anteroinferior and superior plate placement are safe and effective for displaced midclavicular fractures in patients &gt;60 years, the anteroinferior approach involves less operation time, blood loss, complications and implant prominence, and enables faster return to normal activities.

Superior versus anteroinferior plating of displaced midshaft clavicular fracture in patients older than 60 years