English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There was de nitely a transformation or development in Basil of Caesarea’s theological teaching, especially in the Trinitarian theory. Such a maturing of his thought must naturally be a ected by contemporary theological factional rivalries and supported by his understanding of ancient Greek philosophy. However, it is not necessarily easy to follow his theological development and clarify some philosophical in uences on his Trinitarian theory. In order to untangle such a difcult problem, on the one hand, my article will focus on the Epistle 38 conventionally included in the edition of Basil’s le ers, which quite a few scholars now hold to be by Gregory of Nyssa, not Basil.1 On the

THE THEOLOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL BACKGROUND OF BASIL OF CAESAREA’S TRINITARIAN THEORY, FOCUSING ON THE COMPARISON BETWEEN HIS WORKS AND “HIS” EP. 38