English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We say a subset $\Sigma \subseteq F_N$ of the free group of rank $N$ is \emph{spectrally rigid} if whenever $T_1, T_2 \in \cv_N$ are $\mathbb{R}$-trees in (unprojectivized) outer space for which $|\sigma|_{T_1} = |\sigma|_{T_2}$ for every $\sigma \in \Sigma$, then $T_1 = T_2$ in $\cv_N$. The general theory of (non-abelian) actions of groups on $\mathbb{R}$-trees establishes that $T \in \cv_N$ is uniquely determined by its translation length function $|\cdot|_T \colon F_N \to \mathbb{R}$, and consequently that $F_N$ itself is spectrally rigid. Results of Smillie and Vogtmann \cite{MR1182503}, and of Cohen, Lustig, and Steiner \cite{MR1105334} establish that no finite $\Sigma$ is spectrally rigid. Capitalizing on their constructions, we prove that for any $\Phi \in \Aut(F_N)$ and $g \in F_N$, the set $\Sigma = {\Phi^n(g)}_{n \in \mathbb{Z}}$ is not spectrally rigid.

NON-RIGIDITY OF CYCLIC AUTOMORPHIC ORBITS IN FREE GROUPS