English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We apply the “systematic” first-order cosmological perturbation theory method to re-derive the formulation of an inflationary model generated by variation of constants, then to study the case where it is nonminimally coupled to gravity within both the “Metric” and “Palatini” formulations. Accommodating Planck 2018 data with a length scale [Formula: see text] larger than Planck length [Formula: see text] requires amending the model. First, we assume [Formula: see text] gravity where we show that an [Formula: see text]-term within Palatini formulation is able to make the model viable. All along the discussions, we elucidate the origin of the difference between the “Metric” and “Palatini” formalisms, and also highlight the terms dropped when applying the shortcut “potential formulae method,” unlike the “systematic method,” for the observable parameters. Second, another variant of the model, represented by a two-exponentials potential, fits also the data with [Formula: see text].

Inflation by variation of the strong coupling constant: Update for Planck 2018