English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

We present two case reports of patients treated with dabigatran for stroke prevention. Both have non-valvular atrial fibrillation and both were scheduled for direct current electrical cardioversion (DCCV). Both had their activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) measured prior to their DCCV to assess the anticoagulant activity of dabigatran. The decision to measure the aPTT resulted in differing levels to otherwise straightforward cases.

Dabigatran, electrical cardioversion and measuring the aPTT. A safety measure or an unnecessary assessment?