English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A close comparison of  Kepler  short‐ and long‐cadence data released prior to 2011 November 1 has shown some subtle differences that make the short‐cadence data superior to their long‐cadence counterparts. The inevitable results of a faster sampling rate are present: the short‐cadence data provide greater time resolution for short‐lived events like flares, and have a much higher Nyquist frequency than the long‐cadence data; however, they also contain fewer high‐amplitude peaks at low frequency and allow a more precise determination of pulsation frequencies, amplitudes and phases. The latter observation indicates that  Kepler  data are not normally distributed. Moreover, a close inspection of the Pre‐search Data Conditioned long‐cadence data shows residuals that have increased noise on time‐scales important to asteroseismology, but unimportant to planet searches.

An examination of some characteristics of Kepler short‐ and long‐cadence data