English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The historical light curve of the 19th century ‘Great Eruption’ of η Carinae provides a striking record of the violent instabilities encountered by massive stars. In this paper, we report and analyse newly uncovered historical estimates of the visual brightness of η Car during its eruption, and we correct some mistakes in the original record. The revised historical light curve looks substantially different from previous accounts; it shows two brief precursor eruptions in 1838 and 1843 that resemble modern supernova impostors, while the final brightening in 1844 December marks the time when η Car reached its peak brightness. We consider the timing of brightening events as they pertain to the binary system in η Car. (1) The brief 1838 and 1843 events rose to peak brightness within weeks of periastron passages if the pre‐1845 orbital period was ∼5 per cent shorter than that at present due to the mass‐loss of the eruption. Each event lasted only ∼100 d. (2) The main brightening at the end of 1844 has no conceivable association with periastron, beginning suddenly more than 1.5 yr  after  periastron. It lasted ∼10 yr, with no obvious influence of periastron encounters during that time. (3) The 1890 eruption  began  to brighten at periastron, but took over 1 yr to reach maximum brightness and remained there for almost 10 yr. A second periastron passage mid‐way through the 1890 eruption had no visible effect. While the evidence for a link between periastron encounters and the two brief precursor events is compelling, the differences between the three cases above make it difficult to explain all three phenomena with the same mechanism.

A revised historical light curve of Eta Carinae and the timing of close periastron encounters