English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Most patients with syndromic craniosynostosis manifest midfacial hypoplasia that would benefi t from midfacial advancement. Benefi ts of midfacial advancement by distraction osteogenesis have been wellstudied; little has been written about the perioperative morbidity of these procedures, especially as they relate to device selection. This study was designed to compare the peri-operative complications between semi-buried and halo-type distraction osteogenesis of the midface.

A Comparative Analysis of Complications in 55 Midface Distraction Procedures in Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis