English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Previous studies reported that epididymis contains functional LH receptors. The LH receptor knockout mice, which have epididymal phenotypes, gave us an opportunity to test the hypothesis that testosterone replacement alone may not be sufficient to reverse phenotypes to wild-type epididymis. The morphological phenotype in knockout animals includes a decrease in luminal diameter of the proximal and distal caput and cauda epididymis, the absence of clear and halo cells in the epithelial lining, a decrease in the height of principal cells and the number of cells containing cilia, a decrease in cilia length, and a change from basal to central location of nuclei in the principal cells. The biochemical phenotype includes a decrease in periodic acid-Schiff reaction product, reflecting the glycogen and glycoprotein synthesis and secretion, a decrease in androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor (ER)beta, and an increase in ERalpha levels. Twenty-one-day testosterone replacement therapy in 30-day-old knockout animals reversed some, but not all, morphological and biochemical phenotypes. Those that did not reverse include luminal diameters of proximal and distal caput and cauda epididymis, the percentage of ciliated principal cells in caput epididymis, and nuclear AR localization. In summary, while our results reaffirm that androgens are important for normal epididymal morphology and function, they indicate that LH could be required for certain facets of epididymal morphology and/or function.

Epididymal Phenotype in Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Knockout Animals and Its Response to Testosterone Replacement Therapy1