English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this prospective, randomized and controlled study was to compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO₄) and oral sildenafil therapies with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. A total of 34 infants in the MgSO₄ group and 31 infants in the sildenafil group completed the study. The time to reach the adequate clinical response [defined as oxygen index (OI) level of &lt;15, a pulmonary artery pressure of &lt; 20 mmHg) was significantly shorter in the sildenafil group (p = 0.002). Duration of mechanical ventilation was longer and the number of the patients requiring inotropic support was higher in the MgSO₄ group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Although among two groups the difference in OI &gt; 5 as speculated in our hypothesis could only be found at 36 h of the treatment, sildenafil was more effective than MgSO₄ in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborns with regard to time to adequate clinical response, duration of mechanical ventilation and support requirement with inotropic agents.

journal of tropical pediatrics

A Comparison of Magnesium Sulphate and Sildenafil in the Treatment of the Newborns with Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial