English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In agreement with the main tenets of the anthropological theory of the didactic (ATD), this study uncovers dependencies between what students can learn, the established curriculum and the current state of mathematicians’ mathematics (‘scholarly mathematics’). One main result is that the mathematics taught, too often taken for granted by curriculum developers and teachers, is in fact problematic not only to students but also to teachers and curriculum developers and is sometimes a challenge even to current scholarly mathematics. The mathematics taught during a given historical period within a given institution contains flaws that, when they cease to go unnoticed, generate crises, in the form of breaches of the prevailing didactic contract. The resolution of these crises allows the institution and its actors—in particular students and teachers—to learn new contents and often also leads to the more or less damaging unlearning of old contents. This key phenomenon is illustrated, at the triple level of the classroom, the curriculum and scholarly mathematics, with regard to elementary algebra and mathematical analysis, most importantly in the case of maxima and minima problems.

Breaches of the didactic contract as a driving force behind learning and non-learning: a story of flaws and wants