English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The health care workforce is undoubtedly prone to fatigue and sleep deprivation due to extensive hours, shift work and intense demands of the training. The physical and behavioral effects of sleep deprivation can compromise well being and also negatively impact clinical performance. ACGME has been actively engaged in efforts to promote protection of health care trainees from the deleterious effects of sleep deprivation but the grass root level educational efforts towards teaching trainees to mitigate sleep deprivation are lacking. Methods We conducted a 60 minute long “Sleep and Fatigue Training Session” with the goals of increasing the understanding of effects of sleep deprivation and training in countermeasures. The session was conducted as a part of the annual GME orientation session for all the incoming learners. 274 trainees (residents &amp; fellows) participating from all the departments were divided into 25 small groups of 7–12 members each. Clinical vignettes, brief presentation and moderator facilitated interactive discussion were utilized as teaching tools. Handouts with strategies and resources for the trainees were disseminated. Pre and post session surveys were designed to assess trainees baseline understanding of sleep impairment, impact on performance, recognition of impact, possible countermeasures and the impact of module on the aforementioned parameters after the intervention. Results Based on the cumulative trend of participant’s responses obtained on a Likert scale of 1 to 5, results showed improvement in all the parameters including access to training (3.67 to 4.44), awareness (4.31 to 4.46), recognition (4.04 to 4.36), strategies (3.6 to 4.36), and resource availability (3.24 to 4.33). Attendees reported a cumulative score of 4.23/5 in terms of beneficial impact of the module. The resource availability parameter demonstrated the highest average increase (33.6%) after the intervention. The lowest increase in the cumulative trend was displayed (3.5%) in the self-awareness parameter. Conclusion The feedback from learners demonstrated that the interactive model of sleep training session was very favorably received with improved scores in all the parameters assessed. Our model paves the way for other institutes to adopt similar training sessions for learners. Support (if any):

808 Sleep and Fatigue Mitigation: Paving The Way For Training Health Care Trainees