English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Introduction Some individuals demonstrate more performance decrements on the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) after sleep restriction (SR). We investigated whether individuals who reported less alertness and/or less motivation after SR demonstrated poorer performance on the PVT. Methods Fifteen healthy men (22.3±2.8 years) participated in a 10-night inpatient protocol with three nights of 10-hour baseline time in bed (TIB), five nights of SR (5-hour TIB), then two recovery (10-hour TIB) nights. Participants completed the 10-minute PVT (Joggle Research® battery) approximately every two hours during wake. Outcomes included number of false starts (&amp;lt;100 ms reaction time, RT) and number of lapses (≥500 ms RT). Participants reported alertness and motivation levels after each PVT. Median splits were used to characterize changes in alertness (“sleepy,” n=8, versus “alert,” n=7) and motivation (“unmotivated,” n=7, versus “motivated,” n=8) from the last day of baseline to the last day of SR. Outcomes were analyzed in mixed models with the predictor day*alertness or day*motivation, excluding the first three baseline days to preclude practice effects. Results There were significant interactions between day and alertness (p=.025) and day and motivation (p=.043) for false starts. False starts followed a quadratic inverted-U shape across days in sleepy (b=-0.16, p=.003) and unmotivated (b=-0.16, p=.004) participants, but not in alert or motivated participants (p&amp;gt;.05). There was a significant interaction between day and alertness for lapses (p=.008); lapses followed a quadratic inverted-U shape across days with a stronger effect in sleepy (b=-0.43, p&amp;lt;.001) versus alert (b=-0.15, p=.031) participants. There was no interaction between day and motivation for lapses. Conclusion Participants reporting less alertness were more likely to make both false starts and lapses after SR; those reporting less motivation were more likely to make false starts, but not lapses. Findings suggest greater motivation is sufficient to preserve inhibitory control but not vigilance after sleep restriction. In contrast, greater alertness despite sleep restriction was sufficient to preserve inhibitory control and resulted in lower vigilance decrements. Support This study was funded by grant UL1TR000127 from the Clinical and Translational Science Institute and the College of Health and Human Development at the Pennsylvania State University (Chang PI).

0296 Less Self-Reported Alertness and Motivation During Sleep Restriction are Associated with Decreased Attentional Performance