English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Tocilizumab is now approved by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for up to a year in relapsing or refractory giant cell arteritis (GCA). The practicalities of developing a pathway for referral using a hub and spoke model were previously unknown. Here we discuss our novel experiences utilising tocilizumab for GCA in its first year of licensing, after the introduction of a new regional multi-disciplinary team referral pathway. Methods We assessed all patients started on tocilizumab for GCA between August 2018-May 2019. The central assessing hub is St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, a large tertiary rheumatology department in the South of England, serving a population of 1.3 million. Results As per Table 1 below. A total of 9 patients were identified: 6 female and 3 male, with an average age of 74.2 (range 63-80). 5 patients were referred internally from clinicians at St George’s Hospital, with the remainder from local district general hospitals. Steroid protocols between patients were varied, and two-thirds required a 3-day IV methylprednisolone course, including all 4 patients with visual symptoms. A third of patients were on concurrent methotrexate, a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. 8 of 9 patients were on alendronate, vitamin D/calcium, and a gastroprotective agent, and 7 were on aspirin. Reported side effects from steroids were common, with weight gain, increased appetite and osteoporosis noted. All our 9 patients continue their tocilizumab injections, with one individual having a 3-month break for a routine hip operation, and another a 1-month hiatus due to temporary derangement in liver function tests. Tocilizumab proffered improved disease control and few side effects were noted. 3 patients have now been on tocilizumab for 12 months and raise interesting discussions about ongoing funding and treatment efficacy. Conclusion Our case series shows the development and delivery of an effective hub and spoke referral pathway for tocilizumab treatment in GCA. We show that steroid dosing could be reduced with tocilizumab, and that all subjects received full funding for treatment. Our referral pathway has encouraged the uptake of the IL-6 monoclonal antibody treatment for GCA and compliance with NICE guidelines. Disclosures P. Saha None. V. Sandhu None. H. Robinson None. A. Ezeonyeji None. I. Al-Shakarchi None. S. Chander None. R. Suresh None. A. Kaul None. N. Sofat None.

P184 Developing a pathway for tocilizumab treatment in giant cell arteritis: a South London regional experience