English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) tracks US outpatient antibiotic use in prescriptions per 1000 persons (Rx/1000), while the World Health Organization uses defined daily doses per 1000 persons (DDD/1000), which are based on average adult dose, for global surveillance. A third metric, days of therapy (DOT)/1,000 persons, has not been previously evaluated at the national level. We aim to compare time trends in outpatient oral antibiotic use as Rx/1000, DDD/1000, and DOT/1,000 in the same data to inform ongoing CDC surveillance and facilitate international comparison. Methods We identified dispensed outpatient oral antibiotics using pharmacy claims in 2011–2016 IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Databases for individuals  10 were considered biologically implausible and excluded from DDD calculations. We examined trends for each metric from 2011 to 2016 using negative binomial regression. Results Annual numbers of outpatient oral antibiotic prescriptions ranged from 18.6 million to 30.0 million (mean 24.3 million). Overall, Rx/1000 decreased by 7% from 892 in 2011 to 829 in 2016 (Figure 1). From 2011 to 2016, DDD/1000 increased 2% from 23.8 to 24.2 while DOT/1000 decreased 9% from 25.4 to 23.1. Significant per-year decreases were found from 2011 to 2016 for Rx/1000 (−1.1%) and for DOT/1000 (−1.6%), while no significant per-year change was seen with DDD/1000 (table). DDD/1000 underestimate use in pediatrics under the age of 10 (Figure 2). Prolonged duration is seen in adolescents and reflected by DOT/1000. Conclusion Trends in DDD/1000 for population aged &lt;65 years do not mirror trends in Rx/1000 and DOT/1000. These differences may reflect that Rx/1000 and DOT/1000 more accurately capture antibiotic prescriptions in children than DDD/1000. As DDD/1000 underestimate antibiotic use in children, DDD/1000 underestimates reduction in antibiotic use over time and may not accurately reflect changes in use over time. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

1960. Lost in Translation: Comparing Rates of Outpatient Antibiotic Use in Three Metrics