English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens for the treatment of HIV that incorporate the integrase strand inhibitor (INSTI) class of antiretroviral medications have high efficacy and tolerability, and may result in faster time to virologic suppression compared with regimens that contain protease inhibitors (PIs) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). However, differences in viral suppression are not well-defined in routine clinical settings. Methods We performed a retrospective single-center chart review of treatment-naïve HIV patients initiating ART between 2013 and 2016. Among patients on different ART regimen types, we compared rates of achievement of viral suppression (defined as viral load less than limit of detection or <20 copies/uL) over time and median time to viral suppression using chi-square and independent samples median testing. Patients who were prescribed nonstandard regimens, were nonadherent, or discontinued or changed ART within 6 months were excluded. Results One hundred and fifty-five patients—45 (29.0%) female and 110 (71%) male—met study inclusion criteria. Mean age at ART initiation was 41.3 years (SD 12.5), and mean baseline viral load was 293,974 copies/uL. Twelve (7.7%) patients had an opportunistic infection diagnosed at time of ART initiation. Seventy-one (45.8%) initiated an INSTI-based ART regimen, 58 (37.4%) initiated a NNRTI-based regimen, and 26 (16.8%) initiated a PI-based regimen. Eighty-one (52.3%) patients had documented viral suppression, with median time to viral suppression 105 days (IQR 49–159). Patients on INSTI regimens were more likely to achieve viral suppression by 6 months (93.2% compared with 69.7% on NNRTIs and 30.8% on PIs), and had lower median time to suppression (62.6 days vs. 140.5 days on NNRTI regimens and 154.5 days on PI regimens, P = 0.002). Conclusion In this cohort, patients on INSTI-based ART regimens experienced higher rates of viral suppression at 6 months and shorter time from ART initiation to viral suppression. In HIV patients on INSTI-based ART regimens, virologic failure should be suspected prior to the current recommendation of 6 months. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

open forum infectious diseases

Comparison of Time to Viral Suppression Among Treatment-Naïve HIV-Infected Adults Initiating Combination Antiretroviral Therapy by Antiretroviral Regimen Class