English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BACKGROUND Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) is rapidly fatal with current therapies. PVSRIPO is an intratumoral immunotherapy targeting CD155 on antigen-presenting and malignant cells of solid tumors. Preclinically, PVSRIPO treatment leads to systemic, tumor antigen-specific, polyfunctional T-cell–mediated anti-tumor response, predominately driven by type I/III interferons. This inflammatory signature generates anti-tumor immunity and upregulates the programmed death (PD)-1 immune checkpoint in the tumor microenvironment. Preclinical models (including GBM) have shown that PVSRIPO+anti-PD-1/L1 therapy was more efficacious than either agent alone, warranting further investigation. METHODS Adults with histologically confirmed rGBM (1-2 prior progressions), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70, and an active, supratentorial, contrast-enhancing lesion (1-5.5 cm), received PVSRIPO (5x107 TCID50) intratumorally via convection-enhanced delivery (Day 1), followed by 200 mg pembrolizumab IV at week 2, given every 3 weeks for up to 24 months, to evaluate the safety/efficacy of the combination. A safety lead-in period (n=3-6) with a minimum 21–28-day delay before treatment of subsequent patients was planned, with a data safety monitoring board (DSMB) evaluating safety/tolerability prior to expansion (up to N=30). RESULTS The first 3 patients enrolled (ages 55-60, KPS 90-100) all received PVSRIPO followed by pembrolizumab (1-5 cycles), as planned. At cutoff (26-106 days of follow-up), there were no dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-emergent (TE) serious adverse events (SAE), or TEAEs necessitating a delay in initial/subsequent pembrolizumab treatments. All patients experienced a related TEAE, all grade 1 or 2 in severity. One patient experienced an AE of special interest (peritumoral edema, resulting in headache and hemiparesis), successfully managed with low-dose bevacizumab and corticosteroids. The DSMB unanimously recommended the study proceed without modification. CONCLUSIONS Intratumoral PVSRIPO+pembrolizumab was reasonably well tolerated, warranting continued investigation of the safety and efficacy of this combination in patients with rGBM.

CTIM-18. LUMINOS-101: INITIAL SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF PVSRIPO AND PEMBROLIZUMAB COMBINATION THERAPY IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA